UpCloud vs CloudCone
A detailed comparison to help you choose between UpCloud and CloudCone.
UpCloud MaxIOPS storage tops disk benchmarks consistently | CloudCone LA-based VPS with flash sales and low prices | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.5 (367 reviews)✓ | 4.3 (385 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €7/mo | From €2/mo✓ |
| Best for | Database-heavy applications in Europe where disk I/O performance is the primary bottleneck | Budget hobbyist developers and students in North America who want the cheapest possible VPS |
| Performance | ||
| CPU score (sysbench) | 4,600 | — |
| Disk read (fio) | 2,800 MB/s | — |
| Disk IOPS (4K random) | 62,000 | — |
| Network out | 1 Gbps | — |
| Latency (TTFB) | 22 ms | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedsnapshotseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacentergdpr compliantapi accessprivate networking | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedsnapshotss3 compatibleus datacenter |
| Visit UpCloud → | Visit CloudCone → | |
UpCloud
Pros
- + MaxIOPS storage ranks #1 in disk benchmarks
- + 100% uptime SLA — they compensate
- + Strong European datacenter coverage including Helsinki and Warsaw
Cons
- - More expensive than Hetzner for equivalent specs
- - Fewer locations than Vultr
CloudCone
Pros
- + Frequent flash sales with very low prices
- + Hourly billing
- + S3-compatible storage included
Cons
- - US-only datacenter in Los Angeles
- - Support can be slow during high demand
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.