Twingate vs Enclave Networks
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Twingate and Enclave Networks.
Twingate Zero trust network access — replaces VPN | Enclave Networks Zero-trust private networking without VPN complexity | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.1 (347 reviews) | 5.0 (65 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Teams replacing corporate VPN with zero trust access control for remote employees | Engineering teams and cloud-native organizations prioritizing security over convenience, managing distributed infrastructure across multiple regions or cloud providers. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuresssomobile app | free tierapi access |
| Visit Twingate → | Visit Enclave Networks → | |
Twingate
Pros
- + Faster than traditional VPN for resource access
- + SSO integration (Okta, Google, Azure AD)
- + Free for up to 5 users
Cons
- - Cloud control plane dependency
- - Not a traditional internet VPN
Enclave Networks
Pros
- + Eliminate VPN bottlenecks—direct peer-to-peer encryption removes centralized gateways
- + Reduce attack surface—zero trust model means no implicit trust, only cryptographic verification
- + Deploy faster—WireGuard-based setup requires minimal firewall or network reconfiguration
- + Scale efficiently—mesh topology handles growth without performance degradation
Cons
- - Smaller ecosystem compared to established VPN/SD-WAN vendors
- - Requires identity provider integration for policy enforcement—not plug-and-play for basic use cases
- - Learning curve steeper than traditional VPN for teams unfamiliar with zero-trust models
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.