Tigris vs PocketBase
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Tigris and PocketBase.
Tigris Globally distributed database built for modern apps | PocketBase Open-source backend with built-in database and real-time APIs | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.8 (108 reviews)✓ | 4.5 (188 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | free |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free |
| Best for | Fly.io users and serverless developers who want database, search, and object storage from a single platform | Solo developers and small teams building web/mobile apps who want self-hosted backend simplicity without Firebase costs or vendor dependencies. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tieropen sourceself hostable |
| Visit Tigris → | Visit PocketBase → | |
Tigris
Pros
- + Database + search + object storage in one API
- + No connection pools needed
- + Global distribution built-in
Cons
- - Newer platform — smaller community
- - Less mature than MongoDB Atlas
PocketBase
Pros
- + Deploy as single executable with zero external dependencies
- + Generate REST and real-time APIs automatically from database schema
- + Manage data and users through built-in admin dashboard
- + Self-hosted and open-source—full control over data and infrastructure
Cons
- - SQLite backend limits horizontal scaling for high-concurrency applications
- - Smaller community and ecosystem compared to Firebase or Supabase
- - Self-hosting requires basic DevOps knowledge for production deployments
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.