strongSwan vs ZeroTier
A detailed comparison to help you choose between strongSwan and ZeroTier.
strongSwan Open-source IPsec VPN implementation for Linux and embedded systems | ZeroTier Virtual networking — Ethernet over the internet | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (319 reviews) | 4.5 (31 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | free | freemium |
| Starting price | Free | Free tier available |
| Best for | Infrastructure teams building enterprise VPN gateways, SD-WAN solutions, or encrypted tunnels on Linux servers and embedded devices | Homelab operators and small teams wanting virtual Ethernet networks connecting distributed servers |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostable | free tieropen sourceapi access |
| Visit strongSwan → | Visit ZeroTier → | |
strongSwan
Pros
- + Supports both IKEv1 and IKEv2 with modern cryptographic algorithms
- + Minimal dependencies and lightweight, suitable for embedded systems
- + Extensive certificate and PKI integration capabilities
- + Active development with security audits and regular updates
- + Fully open-source with no licensing restrictions
Cons
- - Steeper configuration learning curve compared to GUI-based VPN tools
- - Requires Linux/Unix environment; no native Windows or macOS client implementation
ZeroTier
Pros
- + Free for up to 25 devices
- + Virtual Ethernet — servers appear on same LAN
- + Works through NAT and firewalls
Cons
- - ZeroTier controls the SDN layer — trust required
- - Less control than pure WireGuard
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.