strongSwan vs Zayo
A detailed comparison to help you choose between strongSwan and Zayo.
strongSwan Open-source IPsec VPN implementation for Linux and embedded systems | Zayo Fiber network and colocation carrier | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (319 reviews) | 4.1 (256 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | free | paid |
| Starting price | Free✓ | From €1000/mo |
| Best for | Infrastructure teams building enterprise VPN gateways, SD-WAN solutions, or encrypted tunnels on Linux servers and embedded devices | Enterprises and carriers needing dedicated fiber connectivity between US and European datacenters |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostable | eu datacenterus datacenterprivate networking |
| Visit strongSwan → | Visit Zayo → | |
strongSwan
Pros
- + Supports both IKEv1 and IKEv2 with modern cryptographic algorithms
- + Minimal dependencies and lightweight, suitable for embedded systems
- + Extensive certificate and PKI integration capabilities
- + Active development with security audits and regular updates
- + Fully open-source with no licensing restrictions
Cons
- - Steeper configuration learning curve compared to GUI-based VPN tools
- - Requires Linux/Unix environment; no native Windows or macOS client implementation
Zayo
Pros
- + 141,000+ fiber route miles
- + Dark fiber and wavelength services
- + US and European presence
Cons
- - Enterprise-only pricing
- - Complex procurement process
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.