Statically vs Gcore
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Statically and Gcore.
Statically Global CDN for static assets with instant deployment and free tier | Gcore Global CDN with 150+ PoPs including Russia and CIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.4 (144 reviews) | 4.8 (275 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | free | freemium |
| Starting price | Free | Free tier available |
| Best for | Developers, open-source projects, and small-to-medium websites needing affordable global content delivery with automatic image optimization. | Applications needing CDN coverage in CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa beyond Cloudflare's footprint |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tier | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Statically → | Visit Gcore → | |
Statically
Pros
- + Deploy instantly with zero configuration required
- + Compress and optimize images automatically across all formats
- + Access free tier with 100GB monthly bandwidth
- + Scale globally without managing multiple locations
- + Track performance with detailed analytics and metrics
Cons
- - Limited customization options for advanced routing rules compared to enterprise CDNs
- - Free tier bandwidth cap may require paid upgrade for high-traffic sites
Gcore
Pros
- + Strong CIS, Russia, Middle East coverage
- + 150+ PoPs
- + Free CDN tier available
Cons
- - Luxembourg HQ but some CIS/Russia coverage raises questions
- - Less known brand in Western markets
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.