Statically vs Cloudflare R2

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Statically and Cloudflare R2.

Statically

Statically

Global CDN for static assets with instant deployment and free tier

Cloudflare R2

Cloudflare R2

Zero egress S3 storage on Cloudflare's network

Overview
Rating4.4 (144 reviews)5.0 (203 reviews)
Pricing modelfreefreemium
Starting priceFreeFree tier available
Best forDevelopers, open-source projects, and small-to-medium websites needing affordable global content delivery with automatic image optimization.Applications serving large amounts of user-generated content or assets where egress costs are a major expense
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores0 vCPU
RAM0 GB
Storage0 GB
Bandwidth0 TB/mo
SLA uptime99.9%
Data-center count300
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
Global — Cloudflare network
Tags
Tags
free tier
free tiers3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access
Visit Statically →Visit Cloudflare R2 →

Statically

Pros

  • + Deploy instantly with zero configuration required
  • + Compress and optimize images automatically across all formats
  • + Access free tier with 100GB monthly bandwidth
  • + Scale globally without managing multiple locations
  • + Track performance with detailed analytics and metrics

Cons

  • - Limited customization options for advanced routing rules compared to enterprise CDNs
  • - Free tier bandwidth cap may require paid upgrade for high-traffic sites
View full Staticallyreview →

Cloudflare R2

Pros

  • + Zero egress fees — massive saving for high-traffic assets
  • + S3-compatible API
  • + 10GB free per month forever

Cons

  • - Cloudflare ecosystem lock-in
  • - Not ideal for pure backup storage without lifecycle policies
View full Cloudflare R2review →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.