Scaleway vs Banana

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Scaleway and Banana.

Scaleway

Scaleway

European cloud infrastructure with competitive pricing and transparent billing

Banana

Banana

Serverless GPU inference with built-in model serving

Overview
Rating4.8 (475 reviews)4.5 (328 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemiumusage-based
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forEuropean startups and developers prioritizing cost efficiency, data sovereignty, and avoiding long-term contracts with established cloud providers.ML engineers and startups needing cost-effective serverless GPU inference without DevOps overhead
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores2 vCPU
RAM2 GB
Storage20 GB
Bandwidth1 TB/mo
SLA uptime99.9%
Data-center count5
€/vCPU/mo€0.00
€/GB RAM/mo€0.00
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
FranceNetherlandsPoland
Tags
Tags
free tierhourly billingipv6ddos protectionsnapshotsmanaged optionbare metalgpu availables3 compatibleeu datacentergdpr compliantterraform providerkubernetes supportapi access
gpu availableus datacenterapi access
Visit Scaleway →Visit Banana →

Scaleway

Pros

  • + Configure instances precisely with granular CPU, RAM, and storage options
  • + Access bare-metal servers at lower price points than major competitors
  • + Pay by the hour with no long-term contracts or setup fees
  • + Manage infrastructure via API or intuitive dashboard
  • + Comply with EU data residency requirements with multiple European regions

Cons

  • - Smaller ecosystem and fewer third-party integrations compared to AWS or DigitalOcean
  • - Support response times slower than premium enterprise providers
  • - Limited US region availability; primarily Europe-focused infrastructure
View full Scalewayreview →

Banana

Pros

  • + Deploy ML models without managing servers or Kubernetes clusters
  • + Access multiple GPU types (NVIDIA T4, A40, A100) for different performance needs
  • + Use built-in model templates for common frameworks (PyTorch, TensorFlow, Hugging Face)
  • + Scale automatically from zero to handle traffic spikes

Cons

  • - Limited to inference workloads; not suitable for long-running batch jobs
  • - Colder starts and potential latency compared to dedicated GPU instances
  • - Smaller ecosystem and community compared to AWS or Google Cloud
View full Bananareview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.