PocketBase vs PlanetScale

A detailed comparison to help you choose between PocketBase and PlanetScale.

PocketBase

PocketBase

Open-source backend with built-in database and real-time APIs

PlanetScale

PlanetScale

Serverless MySQL with database branching

Overview
Rating4.5 (188 reviews)4.4 (357 reviews)
Pricing modelfreefreemium
Starting priceFreeFree tier available
Best forSolo developers and small teams building web/mobile apps who want self-hosted backend simplicity without Firebase costs or vendor dependencies.Teams running MySQL at scale who need schema migrations without downtime
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores0 vCPU
RAM0 GB
Storage0 GB
Bandwidth0 TB/mo
SLA uptime99.99%
Data-center count6
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
United StatesEuropean Union
Tags
Tags
free tieropen sourceself hostable
free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapi access
Visit PocketBase →Visit PlanetScale →

PocketBase

Pros

  • + Deploy as single executable with zero external dependencies
  • + Generate REST and real-time APIs automatically from database schema
  • + Manage data and users through built-in admin dashboard
  • + Self-hosted and open-source—full control over data and infrastructure

Cons

  • - SQLite backend limits horizontal scaling for high-concurrency applications
  • - Smaller community and ecosystem compared to Firebase or Supabase
  • - Self-hosting requires basic DevOps knowledge for production deployments
View full PocketBasereview →

PlanetScale

Pros

  • + Non-blocking schema changes — no downtime migrations
  • + Database branching like git
  • + Auto-scales to handle traffic spikes

Cons

  • - No foreign keys (Vitess architecture limitation)
  • - Read replicas only on higher plans
View full PlanetScalereview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.