PocketBase vs Hasura Cloud
A detailed comparison to help you choose between PocketBase and Hasura Cloud.
PocketBase Open-source backend with built-in database and real-time APIs | Hasura Cloud Instant GraphQL API on any Postgres database | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.5 (188 reviews) | 4.9 (129 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | free | freemium |
| Starting price | Free | Free tier available |
| Best for | Solo developers and small teams building web/mobile apps who want self-hosted backend simplicity without Firebase costs or vendor dependencies. | Developers who want to instantly expose their PostgreSQL database as a GraphQL API |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostable | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access |
| Visit PocketBase → | Visit Hasura Cloud → | |
PocketBase
Pros
- + Deploy as single executable with zero external dependencies
- + Generate REST and real-time APIs automatically from database schema
- + Manage data and users through built-in admin dashboard
- + Self-hosted and open-source—full control over data and infrastructure
Cons
- - SQLite backend limits horizontal scaling for high-concurrency applications
- - Smaller community and ecosystem compared to Firebase or Supabase
- - Self-hosting requires basic DevOps knowledge for production deployments
Hasura Cloud
Pros
- + Instant GraphQL from existing database
- + Real-time subscriptions built-in
- + Authorization rules in the API layer
Cons
- - GraphQL expertise helpful
- - Hasura-specific concepts to learn
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.