AWS WAF vs Radware
A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS WAF and Radware.
 AWS WAF Amazon WAF integrated with CloudFront and ALB | Radware Enterprise DDoS protection and application security platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.9 (8 reviews)✓ | 4.7 (217 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | From €5/mo✓ | From €2000/mo |
| Best for | AWS-invested applications that need WAF tightly integrated with their existing CloudFront or ALB setup | Large enterprises and service providers defending critical applications against sophisticated DDoS attacks and web-layer threats. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter | ddos protectionteam features |
| Visit AWS WAF → | Visit Radware → | |
AWS WAF
Pros
- + Deep AWS integration
- + Per-rule pricing — cost-effective for simple use
- + Works with CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway
Cons
- - Complex rule management
- - Requires AWS expertise to use effectively
Radware
Pros
- + Handle massive volumetric attacks with multi-terabit/sec capacity
- + Integrate WAF and bot management without separate tools
- + Deploy on-premise, cloud, or hybrid for flexibility
- + Automate threat detection and mitigation responses
Cons
- - Higher cost for enterprise-grade DDoS capacity
- - Complex configuration and tuning for optimal performance
- - Requires dedicated security team for full platform utilization
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.