AWS WAF vs Nexusguard
A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS WAF and Nexusguard.
 AWS WAF Amazon WAF integrated with CloudFront and ALB | Nexusguard Enterprise DDoS protection and WAF for high-traffic applications | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.9 (8 reviews)✓ | 3.8 (221 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | From €5/mo✓ | From €500/mo |
| Best for | AWS-invested applications that need WAF tightly integrated with their existing CloudFront or ALB setup | Large enterprises and service providers requiring always-on DDoS protection with SLA guarantees and detailed attack reporting. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter | ddos protection |
| Visit AWS WAF → | Visit Nexusguard → | |
AWS WAF
Pros
- + Deep AWS integration
- + Per-rule pricing — cost-effective for simple use
- + Works with CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway
Cons
- - Complex rule management
- - Requires AWS expertise to use effectively
Nexusguard
Pros
- + Detect and mitigate multi-vector DDoS attacks within seconds
- + Scale protection automatically during traffic spikes without infrastructure changes
- + Access detailed attack logs and traffic analytics for compliance and forensics
- + Reduce downtime with 99.9%+ uptime SLA and geo-distributed scrubbing centers
Cons
- - Requires DNS or traffic rerouting configuration, adding setup complexity
- - Pricing scales with traffic volume, potentially costly for spiky workloads
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.