Hivelocity vs Vultr Bare Metal
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Hivelocity and Vultr Bare Metal.
Hivelocity Bare metal servers with direct hardware control and low latency | Vultr Bare Metal High-performance bare metal servers with hourly billing and global deployment | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.4 (42 reviews) | 5.0 (84 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €50/mo✓ | From €120/mo |
| Best for | Developers and businesses running CPU-heavy applications, game servers, or workloads requiring guaranteed dedicated resources. | Engineering teams running database clusters, machine learning pipelines, or distributed computing tasks that need predictable performance and low latency across multiple regions. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedus datacenter | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Hivelocity → | Visit Vultr Bare Metal → | |
Hivelocity
Pros
- + Configure hardware specs to exact requirements
- + Access IPMI and KVM for full server control
- + DDoS protection included at no extra cost
- + Responsive 24/7 technical support team
Cons
- - Higher cost than shared hosting alternatives
- - Setup time required for server provisioning
- - Limited global data center presence compared to hyperscalers
Vultr Bare Metal
Pros
- + Deploy in 30+ geographic regions with consistent API and control panel
- + Access dedicated CPU and memory without resource contention
- + Switch between hourly and monthly billing to match project duration
- + Manage multiple servers programmatically via REST API or CLI
Cons
- - Higher per-server cost compared to shared hosting or cloud instances
- - Requires technical knowledge for OS provisioning and server management
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.