Highlight.io vs Checkly
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Highlight.io and Checkly.
Highlight.io Session replay and error tracking for full-stack debugging | Checkly Monitoring as code with Playwright and API checks | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.4 (290 reviews) | 5.0 (100 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Full-stack development teams that need to correlate user behavior with backend errors to resolve production issues quickly. | Engineering teams who want to define synthetic monitoring tests as code in their repository |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access | free tieropen sourceapi access |
| Visit Highlight.io → | Visit Checkly → | |
Highlight.io
Pros
- + Record complete user sessions with network activity and console logs
- + Search across sessions and errors with powerful filters
- + Detect anomalies and trends automatically
- + Self-host option available for compliance needs
Cons
- - Session replay storage costs grow with traffic volume
- - Setup requires code instrumentation for optimal visibility
Checkly
Pros
- + Monitoring as code in TypeScript
- + Playwright for browser monitoring
- + Works in CI/CD pipeline
Cons
- - Developer-focused — not for non-technical teams
- - Newer than Datadog synthetics
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.