Gcore vs ModSecurity
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Gcore and ModSecurity.
Gcore Global CDN with 150+ PoPs including Russia and CIS | ModSecurity Open-source web application firewall for Apache, Nginx, and IIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.8 (275 reviews)✓ | 4.0 (250 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | free |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free |
| Best for | Applications needing CDN coverage in CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa beyond Cloudflare's footprint | DevOps teams and system administrators running self-managed web servers who need application-layer protection without managed WAF costs. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tieropen sourceself hostable |
| Visit Gcore → | Visit ModSecurity → | |
Gcore
Pros
- + Strong CIS, Russia, Middle East coverage
- + 150+ PoPs
- + Free CDN tier available
Cons
- - Luxembourg HQ but some CIS/Russia coverage raises questions
- - Less known brand in Western markets
ModSecurity
Pros
- + Deploy on-premises with full control and visibility
- + Use industry-standard OWASP Core Rule Set or create custom rules
- + Inspect request/response payloads, headers, and cookies in real-time
- + Free and open-source with active community support
Cons
- - Requires server-level integration and maintenance expertise
- - Rule tuning needed to avoid false positives in production
- - No built-in DDoS rate-limiting or volumetric attack mitigation
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.