Filebase vs Tigris
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Filebase and Tigris.
Filebase S3-compatible object storage with Web3 integration and multi-cloud redundancy | Tigris Globally distributed database built for modern apps | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.9 (63 reviews)✓ | 4.8 (108 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Developers building decentralized apps or projects requiring multi-chain data redundancy with S3 API compatibility. | Fly.io users and serverless developers who want database, search, and object storage from a single platform |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleus datacenterapi access | free tiers3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Filebase → | Visit Tigris → | |
Filebase
Pros
- + Use existing S3 tools and SDKs without code changes
- + Automatically replicate data across decentralized networks for redundancy
- + Access files via IPFS and Arweave without separate infrastructure
- + Competitive pricing compared to traditional cloud storage providers
Cons
- - Performance may vary compared to centralized providers like AWS S3
- - Smaller ecosystem and fewer integration options than established cloud providers
- - Web3 features add complexity if only standard storage is needed
Tigris
Pros
- + Database + search + object storage in one API
- + No connection pools needed
- + Global distribution built-in
Cons
- - Newer platform — smaller community
- - Less mature than MongoDB Atlas
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.