Equinix Colocation vs Vultr Bare Metal
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Equinix Colocation and Vultr Bare Metal.
Equinix Colocation World's largest colocation network — 240 datacenters | Vultr Bare Metal High-performance bare metal servers with hourly billing and global deployment | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.6 (343 reviews) | 5.0 (84 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €500/mo | From €120/mo✓ |
| Best for | Enterprises needing colocation in a neutral facility with direct connections to cloud providers | Engineering teams running database clusters, machine learning pipelines, or distributed computing tasks that need predictable performance and low latency across multiple regions. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | eu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterprivate networking | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Equinix Colocation → | Visit Vultr Bare Metal → | |
Equinix Colocation
Pros
- + 240 datacenters globally
- + Direct cloud connectivity to all major providers
- + Network peering at massive scale
Cons
- - Very expensive for small deployments
- - Enterprise-only pricing
Vultr Bare Metal
Pros
- + Deploy in 30+ geographic regions with consistent API and control panel
- + Access dedicated CPU and memory without resource contention
- + Switch between hourly and monthly billing to match project duration
- + Manage multiple servers programmatically via REST API or CLI
Cons
- - Higher per-server cost compared to shared hosting or cloud instances
- - Requires technical knowledge for OS provisioning and server management
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.