DigiCert vs acme.sh
A detailed comparison to help you choose between DigiCert and acme.sh.
DigiCert Enterprise SSL and TLS certificate authority | acme.sh Free ACME client for automated SSL/TLS certificate management | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.9 (266 reviews)✓ | 3.9 (71 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | free |
| Starting price | From €200/mo | Free✓ |
| Best for | Enterprise and e-commerce companies needing EV certificates with maximum trust indicators and warranty coverage | DevOps engineers and sysadmins managing Let's Encrypt certificates across multiple domains and DNS providers in resource-constrained or Unix-native environments. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | team featuressso | free tieropen source |
| Visit DigiCert → | Visit acme.sh → | |
DigiCert
Pros
- + $1.75M SSL warranty
- + Fastest OV/EV issuance in market
- + Trusted by all browsers globally
Cons
- - Very expensive for most use cases
- - Overkill for basic HTTPS
acme.sh
Pros
- + Deploy to 200+ DNS and hosting providers with minimal configuration
- + Renew certificates automatically without manual intervention
- + Run without root access or external dependencies
- + Support wildcard and multi-domain SAN certificates
- + Generate standalone certificates for non-web services
Cons
- - Shell-based implementation may be slower than compiled alternatives on high-volume deployments
- - Requires manual DNS API credential setup for DNS-01 validation
- - Limited GUI or web interface options for certificate management
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.