Constant (Choopa) vs Vultr
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Constant (Choopa) and Vultr.
Constant (Choopa) Bare metal servers with full control and predictable performance | Vultr High-performance cloud infrastructure with global data centers and competitive pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (229 reviews) | 4.2 (499 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €60/mo | From €5/mo✓ |
| Best for | Teams needing guaranteed resources and full hardware control for production applications or high-traffic services. | Developers and DevOps teams building applications requiring low latency across multiple regions or those prioritizing cost-effective, API-first infrastructure management. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 1 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 1 GB |
| Storage | — | 25 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 1 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.99% |
| Data-center count | — | 32 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €5.00 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €5.00 |
| Performance | ||
| CPU score (sysbench) | — | 4,100 |
| Disk read (fio) | — | 1,800 MB/s |
| Disk IOPS (4K random) | — | 38,000 |
| Network out | — | 1 Gbps |
| Latency (TTFB) | — | 24 ms |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | United StatesUnited KingdomGermanyNetherlandsFranceAustralia+6 |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedsnapshotsbare metalgpu availables3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterterraform providerapi accesswindows available |
| Visit Constant (Choopa) → | Visit Vultr → | |
Constant (Choopa)
Pros
- + Configure hardware specs to exact requirements
- + Integrated DDoS protection included
- + Hourly billing option for testing and short-term use
- + Multiple geographic locations available
Cons
- - Higher base cost than shared or cloud hosting
- - Requires technical knowledge for server management and maintenance
- - Longer provisioning time compared to cloud instances
Vultr
Pros
- + Deploy servers in 32 global locations with minimal latency
- + Access affordable pricing with hourly billing and no setup fees
- + Manage infrastructure via intuitive dashboard or REST API
- + Scale resources on-demand without contract commitments
Cons
- - Smaller ecosystem of pre-built applications compared to AWS or DigitalOcean
- - Support limited to ticketing system; no phone support on lower plans
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.