Amazon S3 vs Wasabi
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Amazon S3 and Wasabi.
 Amazon S3 Scalable object storage for any data size or type | Wasabi No egress fees, no API fees — $6.99/TB | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.2 (198 reviews) | 4.3 (240 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From €7/mo |
| Best for | Teams building on AWS who need reliable, scalable object storage for backups, data lakes, static content, or application data. | Backup storage and archiving where data is written often but read infrequently |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenterterraform provider | s3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessgdpr compliant |
| Visit Amazon S3 → | Visit Wasabi → | |
Amazon S3
Pros
- + Store unlimited data with predictable per-GB pricing
- + Achieve 99.999999999% durability through automatic redundancy
- + Integrate directly with EC2, Lambda, RDS, and other AWS tools
- + Use lifecycle rules to automatically move data to cheaper storage tiers
- + Control access granularly with IAM policies and bucket policies
Cons
- - Data transfer out of AWS incurs egress charges that can add up quickly
- - API requests have per-1000-request pricing; high-frequency access patterns get costly
- - Requires AWS account setup and understanding of bucket configuration for security
Wasabi
Pros
- + No egress fees, no API call fees
- + EU and US datacenter options
- + Flat simple pricing
Cons
- - 90-day minimum storage — early deletion charged
- - No free tier
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.