acme.sh vs Sectigo (Comodo)
A detailed comparison to help you choose between acme.sh and Sectigo (Comodo).
acme.sh Free ACME client for automated SSL/TLS certificate management | Sectigo (Comodo) Affordable OV and EV SSL certificates | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (71 reviews) | 4.6 (141 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | free | paid |
| Starting price | Free✓ | From €20/mo |
| Best for | DevOps engineers and sysadmins managing Let's Encrypt certificates across multiple domains and DNS providers in resource-constrained or Unix-native environments. | Web agencies and hosting companies who want affordable OV/EV SSL certificates for client sites |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen source | — |
| Visit acme.sh → | Visit Sectigo (Comodo) → | |
acme.sh
Pros
- + Deploy to 200+ DNS and hosting providers with minimal configuration
- + Renew certificates automatically without manual intervention
- + Run without root access or external dependencies
- + Support wildcard and multi-domain SAN certificates
- + Generate standalone certificates for non-web services
Cons
- - Shell-based implementation may be slower than compiled alternatives on high-volume deployments
- - Requires manual DNS API credential setup for DNS-01 validation
- - Limited GUI or web interface options for certificate management
Sectigo (Comodo)
Pros
- + Most affordable OV/EV certificates in market
- + Good reseller program for agencies
- + Multi-domain and wildcard options
Cons
- - Brand less premium than DigiCert
- - Validation process can be slow for OV
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.