acme.sh vs DigiCert
A detailed comparison to help you choose between acme.sh and DigiCert.
acme.sh Free ACME client for automated SSL/TLS certificate management | DigiCert Enterprise SSL and TLS certificate authority | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (71 reviews) | 4.9 (266 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | free | paid |
| Starting price | Free✓ | From €200/mo |
| Best for | DevOps engineers and sysadmins managing Let's Encrypt certificates across multiple domains and DNS providers in resource-constrained or Unix-native environments. | Enterprise and e-commerce companies needing EV certificates with maximum trust indicators and warranty coverage |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen source | team featuressso |
| Visit acme.sh → | Visit DigiCert → | |
acme.sh
Pros
- + Deploy to 200+ DNS and hosting providers with minimal configuration
- + Renew certificates automatically without manual intervention
- + Run without root access or external dependencies
- + Support wildcard and multi-domain SAN certificates
- + Generate standalone certificates for non-web services
Cons
- - Shell-based implementation may be slower than compiled alternatives on high-volume deployments
- - Requires manual DNS API credential setup for DNS-01 validation
- - Limited GUI or web interface options for certificate management
DigiCert
Pros
- + $1.75M SSL warranty
- + Fastest OV/EV issuance in market
- + Trusted by all browsers globally
Cons
- - Very expensive for most use cases
- - Overkill for basic HTTPS
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.